A juror question.
453 is excused.
Just what she asked for.
So many jurors got kicked during the course of the Simpson trial that before it was all over the 12 people who were selected as regular jurors had all been replaced by the 12 people who were selected as alternate jurors. Here’s an excerpt from my recorded journal about a juror being dismissed:
” … there was an article in the Daily News about yet another juror asking to be released from jury duty. This one complaining that her husband is sick and she is concerned about him and it is distracting and so forth. She was identified as a 38-year-old white woman and I showed it to Judge Ito and I sure hadn’t heard anything about it. So he asked if they identified the juror and I said, “Yes, a 38-year-old white woman,” and he said, “Yep, that’s her,”
Apparently this knowledge came out in the conversations that the judge had with the jurors. The transcripts of those meetings, which were held in chambers with the doors closed, have not yet been released. So it’s like, OK, how do they know? And he said, “How does the press find this out?” I said, “Well, you’ve got some attorneys that are talking — either that or it’s your court reporter and I don’t think it’s your court reporter.” So he said, “Hmm, [he named another person who was present during the conversation] was in those meetings.” … I said, “Well, I know that [person Ito named]has a very, very cozy relationship with a member of the media, not associated with the Daily News, in fact it’s [I named that person and that person’s news organization]. If she’s got a cozy relationship with one, she could very easily have a cozy relationship with others.” He said, “Yeah, well, I think she is the problem. She has been in here, I have allowed her to be in here, I think she is not going to be in here anymore.= Then, in open court, he said that he wanted to meet with the lead counsel from both sides at noon for about 15 minutes in chambers. I asked him what it was about because the media will want to know what it is about and he said, “It’s none of their business, but between you and me I’ll tell you, it’s about this article. I’m thinking about requiring every single person who was in my meetings with the jurors to make a sworn affidavit statement swearing that they did not leak this information.” … I asked him if he is sure that his chambers are not bugged and he said, “Yeah, they have come in and swept it.” I said, “What about the telephones?” and he said, “Well, you know it could be.”
He talked to the sheriff’s sergeant in charge of the 9th floor about checking to see if his telephone was tapped.